Anolis Docs

Appearance

Multi-Provider Scenario ​

This scenario runs two anolis-provider-sim instances against one FluxGraph server and validates cross-provider coupling.

What It Validates ​

  • Distinct provider identities (provider.name) on one FluxGraph server.
  • Shared graph load (config/multi-provider-extrusion.yaml) across both providers.
  • Observable thermal coupling: chamber warmup raises extruder material output temperature.

Config Files ​

  • config/provider-chamber.yaml
  • config/provider-extruder.yaml
  • config/multi-provider-extrusion.yaml

Both provider configs point to the same physics_config file.

Build Prerequisites ​

Provider-sim (FluxGraph enabled):

bash
cmake --preset ci-linux-release-fluxgraph -DFLUXGRAPH_DIR=../fluxgraph
cmake --build --preset ci-linux-release-fluxgraph --parallel

Windows:

powershell
cmake --preset dev-windows-release-fluxgraph -DFLUXGRAPH_DIR=..\fluxgraph
cmake --build --preset dev-windows-release-fluxgraph --parallel

FluxGraph server must also be built in ../fluxgraph.

Run the Scenario ​

Direct test entrypoint:

bash
python tests/test_multi_provider_scenario.py

Windows:

powershell
python tests\test_multi_provider_scenario.py

Or run through CTest label:

bash
ctest --preset ci-linux-release-fluxgraph -L fluxgraph
powershell
ctest --preset dev-windows-release-fluxgraph -L fluxgraph

Assertions ​

  • Hotend reaches about 230C (within tolerance).
  • Chamber warmup window reaches at least 40C.
  • Coupling delta passes threshold:
    • avg_coupled - avg_baseline >= 8.0C

Environment Overrides (optional) ​

  • ANOLIS_PROVIDER_SIM_EXE
  • ANOLIS_PROVIDER_SIM_BUILD_DIR
  • FLUXGRAPH_SERVER_EXE